{"id":795,"date":"2003-10-06T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2003-10-06T14:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/moss-place.stblogs.org\/?p=795"},"modified":"2003-10-06T09:00:00","modified_gmt":"2003-10-06T14:00:00","slug":"the-wapo-ableis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/moss-place.stblogs.org\/index.php\/2003\/10\/the-wapo-ableis\/","title":{"rendered":"The WaPo:  Ableist, ageist rag"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I just may drop the Post a note about this one:<br \/>\n<a title=\"washingtonpost.com: Search Results\" href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A44524-2003Oct4.html\">Pope Cites &#8216;New and Serious Difficulties&#8217; With Anglicans<\/a> (WaPo, marketing questions)<br \/>\nThe article is worth looking at for the Holy Father&#8217;s words to the Archbishop of Canterbury, of course.  But the line that rubbed me the wrong way was this one (emphasis added):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The ailing pontiff slurred his words <b>but otherwise appeared alert<\/b>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>We all know, of course, that for years the WaPo stylebook has dictated that the word &#8220;pontiff&#8221; shall always be preceded by the word &#8220;ailing&#8221;, whatever the actual topic of the story might be.  (&#8220;Conservative&#8221; is acceptable as an occasional substitute.)<br \/>\nBut the thing that angers me about this particular article is the callous assumption that of course the old guy is dozing off &#8212; and the callous and ignorant assumption that people who slur their speech do so out of a decreased level of consciousness.  News flash, WaPo &#8212; it&#8217;s possible to be fully alert, fully engaged, and still speak unclearly.  There are all kinds of people out there, with a wide range of speech disabilities, who might slur their words but are smarter and more alert than your reporter.<br \/>\nBut as usual, when it comes to covering the Pope, there&#8217;s only one story that the Washington Post and her media sisters are really interested in writing and only one that they ever actually write:  the next conclave &#8212; with the subplot of the battle for the Soul of the Church between the smart progressives v. the troglodyte hard-line conservatives.  No matter <i>what<\/i> the actual story is, that&#8217;s the story they write.  It just writes itself, doesn&#8217;t it?<br \/>\nOh, and memo to the WaPo &#8212; don&#8217;t start planning your conclave coverage just yet.  Like many frail elders, the Holy Father is going to have good days and bad days, and a few bad days are not enough to start buying your tickets for Rome.  <a href=\"http:\/\/domesticpunk.blogspot.com\/2003_10_01_domesticpunk_archive.html#106541386491311892\">Jeanetta<\/a> brings us <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fox41.com\/news\/news_detail.asp?id=10440&#038;section=2\">this example.<\/a><br \/>\n<b>UPDATE:<\/b>  <a href=\"http:\/\/secret-agent.blogspot.com\/2003_10_01_secret-agent_archive.html#106507037054196099\">Secret Agent Man fisks a ghoulish CNN story.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I just may drop the Post a note about this one: Pope Cites &#8216;New and Serious Difficulties&#8217; With Anglicans (WaPo, marketing questions) The article is worth looking at for the Holy Father&#8217;s words to the Archbishop of Canterbury, of course. But the line that rubbed me the wrong way was this one (emphasis added): The&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/moss-place.stblogs.org\/index.php\/2003\/10\/the-wapo-ableis\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The WaPo:  Ableist, ageist rag<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-795","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/moss-place.stblogs.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/795","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/moss-place.stblogs.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/moss-place.stblogs.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/moss-place.stblogs.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/moss-place.stblogs.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=795"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/moss-place.stblogs.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/795\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/moss-place.stblogs.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=795"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/moss-place.stblogs.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=795"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/moss-place.stblogs.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=795"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}