Sentimentality as a kind of bullying

A review of Theodore Dalrymple’s book on sentimentality:

In his new book, he argues that sentimentality is the virus that is eating away at modern life. It destroys the sense of responsibility; it undermines human relationships; and it has a close affinity with aggression and violence.
[It] lies, [Dalrymple] says, in the Romantic idea that feelings must be expressed, and that passions and desires are innocent – which means that they deserve instant gratification. Tact, consideration, self-control and fortitude are cast aside: they indicate ‘repression’, which is bad for you. Good manners are thus reduced to an undesirable psychological condition. But the cult of feeling can have more dramatic consequences than that. As Dalrymple notes, the lynch-law of the media now dictates that anyone who fails to show sufficient feeling in public (the Queen after Diana’s death, Kate McCann after the disappearance of her daughter Madeleine) will be denounced and denigrated.
This is what makes sentimentality so much worse than a mere windy emotionalism: at its core is a special kind of self-righteousness. You do not just have a feeling, whatever it may be (caring passionately about ‘kiddies’, for example, even if the children in question are completely unknown to you); you have a warm glow of superiority in expressing that feeling and hence a righteous hatred of those who do not show it too. ‘There is’, Dalrymple observes, ‘always something coercive or bullying about public displays of sentimentality.’

2 comments

  1. for an agnostic, Dalrymple is amazingly lucid. I have enjoyed two other of his books,Our Culture, What’s Left of It,and, Life at the Bottom.
    Thank you for this review–well done and now I am off to order it.

Comments are closed.