L’Osservatore Romano ran a positive review of Deathly Hallows part 2, and LifeSite News is running an article about Michael O’Brien’s criticism of it. It’s the same old stuff, fluffed up with a few new cherry-picked lines presented totally out of context.
My impulse to write some kind of detailed rebuttal lasted all of about two seconds. Does that make (or prove) me a lazy blogger or a prudent one?